Legal Opinion

Brink v. Rouch

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 21, 1988No. 87-3376/87-3377/87-3378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ORDER

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Petitioner John Brink’s pro se complaints purport to state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for his deprivation of a speedy trial.

But, in fact, his allegations sound in ha-beas corpus.

Apparently, on April 19, 1987, Petitioner was arrested in Adams County, Illinois, on the basis of a warrant charging him with numerous criminal acts in St. Charles County, Missouri, Callaway County, Missouri, and Dubois County, Indiana. On October 15, 1987, while incarcerated in the Adams County Jail and presumably awaiting extradition, he filed the present…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. State of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  2. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API