Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mendoza

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1989No. 18273Published

1DissentSosa, Chief Justice

I hereby adopt as my dissent the majority opinion of the court of appeals as appended herein in full.

APPENDIX

No. 10688.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Feb. 7, 1989.

OPINION

BIVINS, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from an order dismissing the information against defendant charging him with possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. This appeal presents the issue of whether a suspension of proceedings to determine defendant’s competency to stand trial tolls the running of the six-month rule, SCRA 1986, 5-604. We hold it does not and affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Ollie Melvin Hodges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Gonzalo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Grayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API