Legal Opinion

Runge v. Moore

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1972No. Civ. 8753PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Justice.

The action upon which this appeal is premised is being prosecuted by the legal representatives of Annie M. Bell and Elmer Bell, her husband (now deceased). The action was instituted to rescind, cancel, set aside and have declared void two mineral deeds on the alleged ground that the grantors, Annie M. Bell and her husband, Elmer Bell, were induced by duress, menace, fraud and undue influence on the part of the named grantees in said mineral deeds, and others, to execute and deliver the deeds in question. Further, if the court should find that the grantors were not induced by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Delaplain v. GrubbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Doyle v. DoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Jackson ex. rel. Cadwell v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Meyer v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galloway v. GallowayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Matter of Estate of NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Vig v. SwensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Slorby v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Peterka v. JandaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API