Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Sherman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Mark E. Sherman, appeals from the order granting the exceptions of Appellee, Daniel I. Bernstein, to the master’s recommendations concerning partition of certain real property owned by the parties. Specifically, Appellant asks us to determine whether the rules governing partition permit rejection of the master’s recommendations by one of the parties and insistence on the right to a private sale between the parties. After careful analysis and review of the record, we conclude that rejection of the recommendation and insistence on a private sale are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. LaRue v. McGuireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bargo v. KuhnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Russo, F. v. Polidoro, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. McGoldrick, J. v. Murphy, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. McGoldrick, J. v. Murphy, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API