Legal Opinion

Buckner v. Consol Energy Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 23, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2020-1148Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL BUCKNER et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONSOL ENERGY INC. et al., Civil Action No. 20-1148 (TJK) Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COM- PANY et al., Third-Party Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs are trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan. They seek a declaratory judgment that Defendants—eight energy-industry companies—are failing to fulfill their obligations to the plan under the Coal Act. Plaintiffs argue that Defendants are liable for these obligations…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API