McCaw v. T & L Operations, Inc.

This case is before us for the second time. In our first decision, we concluded that plaintiff *416Daniel McCaw’s1 claim was barred by the fireman’s rule and reversed. McCaw v T & L Operations, Inc, 217 Mich App 181; 550 NW2d 852 (1996). The Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, remanded the case for reconsideration in light of its decision in the consolidated cases Gibbons v Caraway and Mariin v Fleur, Inc, 455 Mich 314; 565 NW2d 663 (1997). 456 Mich 869 (1997). We again reverse.

The facts of this case were set out in our previous opinion:

Plaintiff Daniel McCaw is a police officer…