Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fischer v. County of Shasta

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1956No. Sac. 6472Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

The majority here has, without any discussion of the comprehensive statutory scheme set up by the Legislature in the Streets and Highways Code, decided that this ease must be reversed. There is, in the majority opinion, no discussion of the numerous detailed provisions set forth in the Streets and Highways Code each of which has a specific bearing on what the Legislature intended for each type of public way. The majority has, instead, relied on various dictionary definitions of the word “road,” on several California cases which are not in point, and on numerous out-of-state cases…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Gillespie v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Gleason v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API