Legal Opinion
Jack Lustman and Ida Lustman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 22, 1963No. 13658_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, District Judge.
Petitioner, Jack Lustman, appearing pro se, and hereinafter referred to as “the taxpayer,” 1 seeks review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States (Docket 61630) entered August 29, 1960, whereby it was determined as to the taxpayer and his wife, Ida Lustman, on joint returns filed by them for the years 1949 and 1950 that there were deficiencies in the tax liability reported for those years in the respective amounts of $14,728.78 and $1,809.92.
During the years in question, the taxpayer was the sole proprietor of a hosiery manufacturing business in Myerstown,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Falsone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Norene R. O'Dell v. United States of America and Jack Ruhter, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Diamond Bros. Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Abkco Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Home Group v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- United States v. JaskiewiczDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.