Legal Opinion

People v. Motton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1985No. Crim. 24173PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for second degree murder. During the selection of the jury, defense counsel objected that the prosecutor was exercising his peremptory challenges to exclude Black women from the jury. Counsel subsequently objected that the prosecutor was excluding Blacks generally. We reverse the judgment on the ground that the trial court erred on both occasions in finding that counsel had not made a prima facie case of discriminatory exclusion.

In People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 [148 Cal.Rptr. 890, 583 P.2d 748], we recognized the danger that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. ClairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. GarceauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API