Riles v. Semple
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL A. RILES, II, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:17-cv-2178 (MPS) SCOTT SEMPLE, ROLLIN COOK, DAVE MAIGA, WILLIAM FANEUFF, GREGORIO ROBLES, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, DERRICK MOLDEN, AND ANGEL QUIROS, Defendants. RULING ON TIMING ISSUE WITH RESPECT TO EXHAUSTION I. Introduction Following a hearing on exhaustion, the Court ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefing addressing (1) whether Plaintiff Daniel Riles timely exhausted his administrative remedies given his testimony that he became aware of his indefinite placement on “special needs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gregory Turley v. Dave RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Johnson v. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.