Legal Opinion

Town of Hartley v. Floete Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 20, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from O’Brien District Court. — William Hutchinson, Judge. Action to cancel certain warrants issued by the plaintiff city to the defendant company. Decree as prayed. Opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

The plaintiff brings this action in equity, praying the cancellation of certain warrants issued by it to the defendant company. Its theory is that the warrants are void, and it predicates this on substantially these facts:

That the defendant the Floete Lumber Company is, and, at the time of the matters complained of, was, a private corporation, with one of its branch offices and yards in the plaintiff town; that the other defendant, Grotewohl, is and was, at all times covered by the transactions herein complained of, a stockholder and member of the board of directors of the defendant company,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diver v. Keokuk Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Bay v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Kagy v. Independent DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. James v. City of HamburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. MADRID LUMBER COMPANY v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Horrabin Paving Co. v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Cochran v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API