Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. San Antonio Public Service Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1931No. 1163-5470PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

"We adopt, as being substantially correct, the following statement of the nature of this case and the result of the suit made by plaintiffs in error in their application for the writ of error':
“This was a suit by Pauline Jennings against San Antonio Public Service Corporation, alleging that while a minor she was injured through the negligence of defendant in December, 1929, she then being a minor .about fourteen years of age and an orphan; that she was riding in an automobile and was struck by one of defendant’s cars in San Antonio and that she sustained injuries of serious and permanent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Holmes v. BucknerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Sullivan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Williams v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Norwood v. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carter v. G & L Tool Co. of Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Liddell v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Sidran v. TanenbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Rodgers v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Ahumada v. Dow Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API