Legal Opinion

Fish v. First National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Clair. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This action was brought by the bank to *205recover upon certain promissory notes made payable to tbe order of I. N. Jenness & Co. and Frances S. Fish, and indorsed by them. The indorsement of Mrs. Fish was under and made after that of I. N. Jenness & Co. The defense set up is that at the time' these notes were given and indorsed, the firm of I. N. Jenness & Co. was not in existence, because of the death of Henry Fish, one of the members thereof; that if Mrs. Fish is liable upon these notes, she is jointly liable with Isaac N Jenness, and that if he is released because there was no such firm, then…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. MarquettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. First National Bank v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. CaldwellDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API