Legal Opinion

Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Acheson, D. J.

The plaintiff’s claim to exemption from local taxation on its real estate rests upon the assumption that section 17 of the act of assembly of June 7, 1879, (P. L. 112,) entitled “An act to provide revenue by taxation,” is still in full force. That section enacts that “in case any bank or savings institution incorporated by this state, or any national bank, elect to collect annually from the shareholders thereof a tax of six-tenths of 1 per centum upon the par value of all the shares of said'bank or savings institution, and pay the same into the state treasury on or before the…

2Cases cited264 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of America, National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. LimaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
  2. Gray v. Logan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Bowers v. Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1907
  4. Sanders v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API