Legal Opinion
DUART v. Department of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 1, 2009No. AC 29994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Bonnie Duart, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it denied her motion for a new trial, in which she alleged that the defendant, the department of correction, engaged in discovery misconduct. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the court, in denying the motion, relied on an improper standard when it concluded that she was required to show that the outcome of the trial would have been different without the defendant’s alleged discovery misconduct.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the plaintiffs appeal. This case…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Weese v. SchukmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duart v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Johnson v. Raffy's Café I, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- DUART v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- United Public Service Employees Union, Cops Local 062 v. HamdenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Despres v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.