Legal Opinion

Chatard v. Oveross

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2009No. B213392PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, J.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal raises the issue whether the beneficiary of a spendthrift trust who also acts as trustee and commits a breach of trust causing financial harm to the trust can have her interest in the trust estate impounded to satisfy a claim arising from her misfeasance. Because the damage resulting from the trustee’s breach of her fiduciary duty will otherwise be sustained by the beneficiaries, we hold that the trustee’s interest can be reached to satisfy the claim notwithstanding the existence of the spendthrift provision. We therefore affirm the trial court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. County National Bank & Trust Co. v. SheppardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Estate of IvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Edwards v. County National Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leader v. CordsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Todd Frealy v. Rick ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. King v. King (In re King)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Godoy v. LinznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Josiah v. Jackson CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API