Legal Opinion

Pacific Mid-Continent Corp. v. Tunstill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1942No. 14338PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction.

The plaintiff, W. A. Tunstill, sued the defendants, Pacific Mid-Continent Corporation, a corporation, and L. W. Frankley, the latter being described in plaintiff’s pleadings as president of said corporation. Plaintiff’s petition contains three counts; the first appearing to set out a claim for damages for conspiracy by said defendants to secure damages from plaintiff, the nature of which it is not necessary to discuss here; the second appearing to be somewhat in the nature of a suit to compel specific…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Rogers v. Daniel Oil & Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Craig v. Pittman & Harrison Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Galbraith v. BishopTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Boyd v. CrabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Norrell v. National Motor Club of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Preissman v. Allied Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API