Legal Opinion

Friesz v. Olsness

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The defendant and respondent, Olsness, is the commissioner of insurance of the state of North Dakota and as such is charged with the administration of the State Hail Insurance Department.

The plaintiff and appellant, Friesz, is a farmer living in Grant county. In 1923 he withdrew his crop from state hail insurance protection. Thereafter, he decided that he would take advantage of the state insurance, and on July 2, 1923 he executed the proper papers to cancel the withdrawal and reinstate such insurance and to apply for additional indemnity, under the provisions of §§ 12 and 15, chapter 232,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Independent Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Anderson v. FalleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Styles v. DickeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Phillips v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hogg v. ChristensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Schmitz v. Olsness Ex Rel. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API