Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 31, 1999No. Nos. 98-2382, 98-2479PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The City of Chicago, along with several city officials and an intervenor class of legal permanent residents, brought suit against the Secretary of Health and Human Services and other federal officers to challenge certain provisions of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (1996) (“the Welfare Reform Act” or “the Act”), that restrict certain noncitizens’ eligibility for welfare benefits. The plaintiffs alleged that the provisions of the Act that disqualify most legal aliens from receiving Food…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Srail v. Village of Lisle, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Robert Brown v. City of Michigan City, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Soskin v. ReinertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Lewis v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Celia Aleman v. Dan E. Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.