Legal Opinion

Soto v. Fogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated November 3, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff Joann Soto did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The defendant established a prima facie case that the injured plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Lincoln v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Gleason v. HuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Charlton v. AlmarazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Louros v. ParmiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Greggs v. KurlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Beltran v. Sen ShiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Ki Chang Kim v. PokrussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API