Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1996PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff had not sustained a "serious injury” as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The plaintiffs affidavit, which consisted of subjective complaints of pain, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Almonacid v Meltzer, 222 AD2d 631). The unsworn report by the plaintiffs treating physician was not in admissible form and cannot be considered (see, Pagano v Kings-bury, 182 AD2d 268). The only other admissible evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition, the affidavit of Dr. Leonard Schuchman, was insufficient to defeat…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Pagano v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Giannakis v. PaschilidouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Georgia v. RamautarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. DiNunzio v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Guzman v. Paul Michael ManagementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Merisca v. AlfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Jimenez v. KambliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Carroll v. JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API