Legal Opinion

Voltz v. Chrysler Group LLC-UAW Pension Plan

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 22, 2014No. Case No. 3:13 CV 2606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff Trudi Voltz (“Voltz”) claims disability benefits through her former employer, Chrysler Group LLC (“Chrysler”). She based her 2011 benefits application on dermatitis, triggered, she says, by certain workplace chemicals. Two reviewing physicians disagreed with the opinion of Voltz’s personal physician, who viewed the dermatitis as a disabling condition. On appeal from the Chrysler Group LLC— UAW Pension Plan’s (“Plan”) initial denial, a third physician found Voltz was not disabled because of her skin condition. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. ATA v. ScuttCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. Boos v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Virginia Armistead, Cross-Appellants v. Vernitron Corporation Aie--Division of Vernitron Group Insurance Plan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramdeen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API