Legal Opinion
Val-U Const. Co. of South Dakota, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 29, 1995No. CIV 94-4121PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Val-U Construction Company, was awarded- a construction contract with the United States government, acting through the Rosebud Sioux Tribe as general contractor, pursuant to an agreement "with the Indian Health Service [IHS], to build 66 staff quarter units to serve the newly completed IHS Hospital on the Rosebud reservation. On September 25, 1990, and before completion of the project, the Tribe terminat ed the contract with Val-U. Val-U brings this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act [FTCA] alleging breach of common law…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allender v. ScottDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Big Owl v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1997
- Stago v. Wide Ruins Community School, Inc.Navajo Nation Supreme Court · 2002
- Coverage Issues Under the Indian Self-Determination Act, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1998
- Larson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.