Legal Opinion

Stuart-James Co. v. Division of Employment & Training

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1991No. 90CA0430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge JONES.

Stuart-James Company, Inc., seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which deter*6mined that Denise Christensen and all other similarly-situated securities salespersons are in covered employment pursuant to § 8-70-103(10)(a), C.R.S. (1986 Rep.Vol.3B), then in effect, for unemployment compensation tax liability purposes. We affirm in part and set aside in part.

On August 2, 1988, the Division of Employment and Training issued a tax liability determination in which it was held that Christensen and all other similarly-situated securities…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kinterknecht v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Stevenson v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Clasby v. KlapperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Industrial Commission v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Hiller v. Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Celebrity Custom Builders v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Donn v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. N.M. State Inv. Council v. WeinsteinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API