Legal Opinion

N.M. State Inv. Council v. Weinstein

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2016No. 33,787 34,042 34,077Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: ___________ 3 Filing Date: March 24, 2016 4 NOS. 33,787, 34,042 & 34,077 (Consolidated) 5 NEW MEXICO STATE INVESTMENT 6 COUNCIL, as Trustee, Administrator, and 7 Custodian of the LAND GRANT PERMANENT 8 FUND and the SEVERANCE TAX PERMANENT 9 FUND, 10 Plaintiff-Appellee, 11 and 12 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. FRANK 13 FOY, SUZANNE FOY, and JOHN CASEY, 14 Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, 15 v. 16 DANIEL WEINSTEIN, VICKY L. SCHIFF, 17 WILLIAM HOWELL, and MARVIN ROSEN, 18 Defendants-Appellees. 19 and 20 GARY BLAND, et al., 21…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Human Services Department v. StaplesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API