Legal Opinion
Local 1006, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Wurf
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 10, 1982No. 76 C 2744PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
On the eve of trial of this old, complex, and hard-fought case, all of the defendants filed a joint motion for summary judgment. 2 They have submitted legal memo-randa in support of their motion, with no accompanying affidavits. The plaintiffs have opposed the motion with their own legal memorandum, also unsupported by affidavit.
The Court has considered the filings, and because of the inadequacy of the briefs has done extensive research on its own. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- 38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1685, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,604 Silas J. Alexander v. Chicago Park DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Stitzer v. University of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985
- O'Hara v. Board of Education of the Vocational School in the County of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Webb v. Alabama, Department of Pensions & SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Wendell Webb v. State Of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.