Romanik v. Rapoport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal "by the plaintiff, Joe Romanik, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor" of the defendants Kovensky and another, entered in the office -of the clerk -of the -county of Kings on the 2d day-of Starch, T909j upon "the decision-of the court, rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special "Term, dismissing the complaint upon the merits as to said defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, J.:
On June 3, 1907, plaintiff entered into a written contract with Hax Rapoport and Charles Ratner for the performance of *689certain work in connection with the erection of seventeen buildings on the south side of Prospect place, in the borough of Brooklyn, belonging to the said Bapoport. On the 17th of January, 1908, plaintiff filed a notice of a mechanic’s lien against the said property. On the 14th of February, 1908, the said lien was discharged by the filing of a bond in accordance with the provisions of the statute, (See Lien Law [Gen. Laws, chap. 49; Laws of 1897, chap. 418], § 18,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Toop v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Ringle v. . Wallis Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Foster v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Finn v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Vitelli v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aronoff v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Genesee Lumber v. BonarigoNew York Supreme Court · 1931