Legal Opinion
Genesee Lumber v. Bonarigo
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Wheeler,
Official Referee. This action is brought to establish and foreclose mechanics’ liens in which various hens are asserted by different defendants.
The only contest arising on the trial of this action is one as to the validity of a hen asserted by the defendant Goade & Flohr, copartners, who claim a hen for the sum of $2,080.71. Angelo Bonarigo was the owner of the property improved. He had a contract with Lawrence Calabro for the improvement of a certain building in the city of Batavia, N. Y.
Calabro in turn, on or about July fifth, entered into a contract with the firm of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pascual v. Greenleaf Park Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Chambers v. George Vassar's Sons & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
- Barrett v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Heinlein v. MurphyNew York City Court · 1893
- Firth v. RehfeldtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Delaware Towers, Inc. v. Siegfried Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Dwelle-Kaiser Co. v. MoonNew York Supreme Court · 1931