Legal Opinion

Normandin v. Freidson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1930No. Nos. 28,120, 28,121PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from separate judgments entered pursuant to directed verdicts.

Plaintiffs rented a residence from defendant on August 5, 1926. Defendant agreed to make certain specific repairs. He made them. The controversy relates to the negotiations relative to a stairway leading into the cellar. The two bottom steps were missing. The two upper steps were apparently an inch thick, while the others were perhaps two inches thick. These two top steps were some what triangular in form in order to compensate for a turn on entering the stairway at the top. The stairway was near the soil beneath,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mesher v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Galvin v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. McGee v. HardacreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Barron v. LiedloffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Harpel v. FallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Anderson v. WinkleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Porter v. Grennan Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. McElroy v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API