Burger King Corp. v. Weaver
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM
ARONOVITZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Burger King Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim (all sixteen counts), file dated December 6, 1991.
The Court has considered the Motion, response, reply, affidavits and supplemental written filings, oral argument of counsel, applicable law, and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons which follow, we grant Plaintiffs motion in part and deny it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Market Street Associates Limited Partnership and William Orenstein v. Dale FreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Friedman v. Virginia Metal Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Dade Enterprises, Inc. v. Wometco Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Scheck v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Burger King Corp. v. AgadDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Barnes v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Hospital Corp. v. FLORIDA MED. CENTERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Holiday Inns Franchising, Inc. v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.