Legal Opinion

Reilly v. McKinnon

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 5, 1908No. Nos. 37, 38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The above cases were tried together below by agreement of counsel, and a verdict in each case was directed for the plaintiff by the learned trial judge. From the judgments thereon entered, writs of error were duly taken to this court where' the cases have been argued together. McKinnon was the plaintiff below in both actions, and the original defendants therein were John A. Reilly and Joseph Rynkievicz, but, during the pendency of the suit against Reilly, he died, and his executrix, Mary A. Reilly, was thereupon substituted as a defendant in his stead.

The facts in brief…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Hotchkiss v. National BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. King v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Wakeman v. . DalleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hicks v. Second Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. First National Bank v. StoverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API