Legal Opinion

Yee Chong Lung & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 29, 1922No. 2171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph N of section 3 of the tariff act of 1913, among other things, provides that the decision of the collector as to the rate and *383amount of duties upon imported merchandise shall be final and conclusive against all parties interested therein "unless the owner, importer, consignee, or agent of such merchandise” shall file a protest or protests in writing with the collector, etc.

The two protests involved in this case were duly filed and the sufficiency thereof, except as hereinafter stated, is not challenged.

One protest was signed "Yee Chong Lung & Co. By F. L. Lawrence, atty.” and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Hill v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Brown v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. American Ship Windlass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1908
  5. Wells v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rico Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Caldwell Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972
  5. United States v. F. L. Kraemer & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API