Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 20, 2003No. 03-20194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellee Ruby D. Henry Bell was convicted on a plea of guilty for using a telephone to convey a false threat to damage or destroy a building by means of an explosive, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e). 1 At sentencing, the district court granted a defense motion to depart downward within the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or the “Guidelines”) from a criminal history category of VI to a criminal history category of IV. The district court appears to have granted this motion on the- basis of overstatement of criminal history, as provided for by Guidelines § 4A1.3; however, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. ThamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. John S. MallonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Robin DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API