Legal Opinion
Lemon v. Harvey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 25, 2006No. Civil Action 05-949 (RCL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiffs’ Motion [36] for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and defendants’ Motions [26, 27, 28] to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, or in the alternative, Motions for Summary Judgment. The Court will grant plaintiffs’ Motion [36], as the Court finds plaintiffs’ amendments have no effect on the Court’s ruling on defendants’ Motions [26, 27, 28] — which the Court will also grant. The Court finds the plaintiffs lack standing to bring this action and so will dismiss their claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lemon v. GerenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Virginia State Water Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Role Models America, Inc. v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Lemon v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lemon v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009