Legal Opinion

Lemon v. McHugh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 10, 2009No. Civil Action 05-949 (RCL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Upon consideration of defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [66, 67, 68], plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [69], plaintiffs’ Statement of Points and Authorities [70], defendants’ Replies [71, 72, 74], plaintiffs’ Reply [75], the applicable law, and the Administrative Record [77-1 to -6] herein, the Court finds that the federal defendants failed to make a convincing case that no Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (“SEIS”) was needed. However, plaintiffs’ requested relief is not appropriate at this time. Therefore, defendants’…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Occidental Engineering Company v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
City of Olmsted Falls, Ohio v. Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Transportation, City of Cleveland, Ohio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019