Legal Opinion
State v. Birkla
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 1994No. 20593PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED DECEMBER 7, 1994, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN
PERRY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a criminal conviction and sentence for infamous crime against nature. I.C. §§ 18-6605 and 18-6606. In this appeal we are asked to decide whether certain alleged errors below warrant a new trial or other relief. For the reasons stated, we affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Mike Lee Birkla was charged with infamous crime against nature, stemming from events occurring July 11,1992. Birkla alleg edly met two women in a Pocatello bar and returned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SilvaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. KuzmichevIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.