Legal Opinion

(PS) Smith v. Home Depot

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01192Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER SMITH, No. 2:24-cv-1192 DAD AC (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 HOME DEPOT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 18 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendant moves to dismiss the 19 Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff opposes the motion. 20 ECF No. 22. Defendant replied (ECF No. 23) and plaintiff submitted an unauthorized surreply…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API