Legal Opinion

Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order granting plaintiff’s motion for examination of a witness before trial modified by striking out items (a) to (e), inclusive, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The items mentioned pertain only to hearsay testimony not material and necessary on the trial. Item (f) relates to conversations with the officers of defendant bank in which admissions pertinent to the issues may be obtained. The facts presented warranted the exercise of discretion at Special Term in granting the examination in this respect. (Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 App. Div. 180; Bartlett v. Sanford, 244 id.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Victor G. Bloede Co. v. J. P. Devine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Albero v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API