Legal Opinion

United States v. Galbreath

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 20, 1925No. 2539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

The agreed statement iff this case shows_ that the defendant, who was not an officer of the United States, assisted one Ike Caveny, who was a prohibition agent, in the performance of his work. Although prohibition agents are “civil officers of the United States,” this did not constitute the defendant such an officer, because the office of assistant to a prohibition agent does not exist. Leonard v. United States (C. C. A. 1) 6 F.(2d) 353, 355.

Such being the case, it appears that, after several purchases of intoxicating liquor had been made by defendant and Caveny from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Leonard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  3. Ex Parte WintersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. William C. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. State v. SherrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. United States v. Ralph IovenelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. State v. StricklandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. United States v. ConnoughtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API