Rhodes v. Hunt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CROW, Judge.
This multi-count action is a dispute mainly between offspring of Gilbert Spears and Dorothy Spears, both deceased. By Count VI of their first amended petition, the plaintiffs (whom we shall introduce infra) sought judgment setting aside a quitclaim deed.
The trial court severed Count VI from the other counts for purpose of trial and heard it with an advisory jury, which returned a verdict “in favor of defendants.”1 Pursuant to Rule 74.01(b), Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure (1995), the trial court expressly determined there was no just reason for delay in entering judgment on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Cleary v. ClearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Wilkie v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Staab v. ThoresonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- LeMehaute v. LeMehauteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mason v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Spielvogel v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Greuter v. WetekampMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hoefer v. MusserMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.