Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Pittston Area School District

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1657Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NITZAI. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, DISTRICT JUDGE

INTRODUCTION

Before this Court are a motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 56 by Defendants Anthony Guariglia, Bruce Knick, Kent Bratlee, John Donahue and Charles Sciandra (collectively, “Defendants”), seeking to dismiss the remaining civil rights claim against them premised on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”), [ECF 44-46], and a response in opposition filed by Janet Donovan (“Plaintiff’). [ECF 49-51, 53]. The issues asserted in the motion for summary judgment have been fully briefed and are…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API