Legal Opinion
People v. Chambers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror (see, People v Bludson, 281 AD2d 948). Defendant contends that the prospective juror indicated a bias in favor of the testimony of police officers, thereby precluding his service as an impartial juror. We disagree. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the prospective juror did not “reveal knowledge or opinions reflecting a state of mind likely to preclude impartial service” (People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614). When the pro*905spective jurors were asked…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ChatmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HagenbuchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. WiegertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. IddingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004