Legal Opinion

E. P. Stacy & Sons v. Moher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Assumpsit by E. P. Stacy & Sons against Jeremiah H. Moher for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff is a wholesaler of groceries and produce in the city of Minneapolis. Defendant is a retailer of groceries, and produce in the city of Sault Ste. Marie. On the 25th day of May, 1914, the parties entered into a written contract by which defendant purchased of plaintiff 175 cases of selected storage eggs for future delivery. That part of the contract material to this controversy follows:

“J. H. Moher, of Soo, Mich., party of the first part, hereby purchase of E. P. Stacy & Sons, party of the second part, and said E. P. Stacy & Sons hereby sell said J. H. Moher one hundred seventy-five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Copas v. Anglo-American Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Baker v. KamantowskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salzman v. MaldaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Independent Metal Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  3. Amos v. Walter N. Kelley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Allegrezza v. ScalcucciMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API