E. P. Stacy & Sons v. Moher
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Assumpsit by E. P. Stacy & Sons against Jeremiah H. Moher for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff is a wholesaler of groceries and produce in the city of Minneapolis. Defendant is a retailer of groceries, and produce in the city of Sault Ste. Marie. On the 25th day of May, 1914, the parties entered into a written contract by which defendant purchased of plaintiff 175 cases of selected storage eggs for future delivery. That part of the contract material to this controversy follows:
“J. H. Moher, of Soo, Mich., party of the first part, hereby purchase of E. P. Stacy & Sons, party of the second part, and said E. P. Stacy & Sons hereby sell said J. H. Moher one hundred seventy-five…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Copas v. Anglo-American Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Baker v. KamantowskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Salzman v. MaldaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Maryland Cas. Co. v. Independent Metal Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Amos v. Walter N. Kelley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Allegrezza v. ScalcucciMichigan Supreme Court · 1929