In the Interest of J.M. and Z.M., Minor Children
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this parental termination case, we determine whether a motion for new trial and notice of appeal combined in one document can invoke appellate jurisdiction. The court of appeals determined that the combined filing at issue in this appeal did not confer appellate jurisdiction and therefore failed to reach the merits of the appeal. Because the combined filing was titled a notice of appeal and expressed the party’s intent to appeal to the court of appeals, we conclude the document was a bona fide attempt to invoke appellate jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Interest of K.A.F.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Warwick Towers Council of Co-Owners Ex Rel. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Park Warwick L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Sweed v. NyeTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Interest of J.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
3Cited by35 opinions
- Black v. ShorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- In the Interest of L.C.W., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
- City of Houston and Daniel W. Kruger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and Engineering Department v. Little Nell Apartments, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Charles Ronald Wade v. Harris County, Harris County Department of Education, Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Harris County Flood Control District, Harris County Hospital District, City of Houston, Houston Independent School District, and Houston Community College Sy, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016
- Dan Levin v. Eduardo S. Espinosa, in His Capacity as Receiver of Retirement Value, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.