Legal Opinion

In the Interest of K.A.F.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2005No. 04-0493PublishedCited by 280 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

In this case, we must decide whether the rules of appellate procedure permit post-judgment motions to extend the appellate deadline for filing an accelerated appeal. We hold that they do not. We further hold that filing a motion for new trial may not be considered a bona fide attempt to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment.

I

Louis Faucheaux petitioned the trial court to involuntarily terminate Susan Carroll’s1 parental rights to their daughter, K.A.F. The jury found that Carroll’s rights should be terminated, and the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. SherryTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Home Owners Funding Corp. of America v. Scheppler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by280 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  5. Few v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

275 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API