Legal Opinion

Dimes v. Golden Bell Cleaners, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 25, 1944Published

1Opinion of the CourtPetungell, P. J.

Action in which the plaintiff joins a count in contract with one in tort, the counts being for one and the same cause of action. The plaintiff sues as the owner of a rug entrusted to the defendant for dyeing and not returned. The defendant’s answer consists of a general denial and a plea of the statute of limitations.

There was evidence that the rug was delivered to the defendant in 1937; that after three or four weeks the plaintiff *216began calling for it; that the defendant twice attempted to deliver to the plaintiff a rug which the plaintiff rejected in each case as not the one delivered to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WhoriskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Barry v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Norwood Trust Co. v. Twenty-Four Federal Street Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Zytka v. DmochowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Barton v. Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API