Legal Opinion

People v. Eblin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 1983No. 82-131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

The question before us is whether a defendant who appears to answer a criminal complaint pursuant to a notice to appear but is not required upon appearance to post bail or recognizance, can claim a right to be released when more than 160 days transpire after his demand for a speedy trial.

The State appeals from a judgment which discharged the defendant. It contends that the trial court erred in equating the notice to appear with bail and bond requirements. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 103 — 5.) The defendant has not filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. The People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. RodgersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. People v. GarciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. People v. RhoadsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. StinnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. People v. BaltimoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. People v. BaltimoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. People v. KaedingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. StevensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API