Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. McDonough
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 18, 2006No. 1D05-3702PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
931 So.2d 171 (2006)
Jesse RUTLEDGE, Petitioner,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
No. 1D05-3702.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 18, 2006.
Rehearing Denied June 22, 2006.
Jesse Rutledge, pro se, Petitioner.
Philip A. Fowler, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
The petitioner's argument that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying his petition for writ of mandamus is without merit and is rejected. But because the underlying action constitutes…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- McDonough v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Cox v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Peacock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
4Cited by2 opinions
- Aguilar v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Lowery v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007