Hixon v. Deering
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is an action in replevin brought by the appellee Deering to repossess a tractor and related equipment which he had sold to the appellant Hixon. Upon filing the suit Deering obtained possession of the property by making bond in accordance with the statute, that “he shall perform the judgment of the court herein by returning the property, if a return thereof shall be adjudged, and by paying such sums of money as may be adjudged therein against him in this action, not exceeding double the value of the property.” See Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-2105 (Repl. 1962). The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Apgar v. Great American Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Wisconsin Livestock Ass'n v. BowermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Whisenhunt v. SandelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Bankers Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970