Hayden v. Hefferan
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Relator applied for mandamus to compel the payment of interest on a judgment for costs in her favor on appeal from the probate of a will, and brings certiorari to review the order denying the writ. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The appellant appealed from the probate of her father's will, and obtained a judgment in her favor, with costs payable out of the estate, which judgment was affirmed by this Court. See 95 Mich. 332. The judgment of the circuit court was rendered on March 28, 1892, and the costs were not taxed until July 1, 1893, after the case had been determined by this Court. They were retaxed, upon appeal from the taxation by the clerk, upon the 21st of October, 1893, at the sum of $683.45, which sum the administrator paid to the clerk of the circuit court, refusing to pay interest upon the sum taxed. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haines v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Palmer v. GloverIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Saunders v. Tioga Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Warner v. JuifMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Linck v. City of LitchfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyoming Central Irr. Co. v. LaPorteWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
- Hoyt v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Jones v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Owosso v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916